weed
wēd/
noun
1.a wild plant growing where it is not wanted
and in competition with cultivated plants.
Anonymity
is a luxury not often afforded to the things we choose to hate. We know the names of the people we don’t
like, the foods we think are disgusting, the brand of the sweater with the
scratchy collar. Regardless of the
trend, this still isn’t true for everything.
One object of our hate that is unknown and largely misunderstood is
something we see everyday: weeds. We see
them in our yards and in our neighbors’ yards, and immediately there is
judgment. We decide that the person who
let them grow is lazy or uncaring, that the plants themselves have something
inherently wrong about them. They are
simply bad. There is something intrinsically negative
about them. But do we really understand
these plants? Never mind understand
them, how many of them can one person name?
These weeds are considered menaces and scourges but we can’t give a name
to this enemy, nor do we truly understand anything about them.
When
scientists consider weeds, they arrive at a dichotomy. Since weeds are wild plants growing where
they aren’t wanted, this could be because they are growing in competitions with
two kinds of plants, cultivated plants or native plants. In both cases, the weeds are competing
against the preferred plants. However,
this situation lead may sometimes lead to an interesting occurrence: both
plants involved may be labeled as weeds. This is because one is a wild plant growing where it is not wanted and the other is an invasive species. The first approach to this idea is the one that is
more commonly thought of. This perspective holds that weeds are issues to be dealt with and eradicated in order to
maintain a perfect garden. Examples of
these such plants are the Asiatic Hawkesbeard and the Spanish Needle. But looking at these examples introduces a
further dichotomy in the idea that the former of these two plants is an
invasive species and the former is a native plant. People often don’t think about this difference
when they are attempting to remove these plants from their lawns and
gardens. They will indiscriminately attack
both types because they supposedly pose a threat to cultivated plants, which
are probably nonnative and may then be labeled as weeds themselves.
While it is important to look at weeds through the first lens, it is also imperative to consider the complexly and look at the from different angles. To do this, invasive plants must also be viewed as weeds. According to Christen Mason; Chair of Land Resources Bureau, South Florida Water Management District; some examples of these kinds of weeds are “Brazilian pepper, Mexican petunia, earleaf acacia and carrotwood”. These plants are often grown in homes but may sometimes manage to creep into protected and natural land areas where they will grow and begin to compete with natural plants. They will then be designated as invasive species. These plants can have disastrous effects upon native ecosystems. These are especially dangerous in places such as the Florida Everglades. “Terrestrial species such as melaleuca create dense thickets that outcompete native plants, provide no wildlife value and alter topography and hydrology. Old World climbing fern grows up and over tree canopies in our tree islands, causes canopy collapse and alters fire behavior,” says Mason. These are just some examples of these plants' negative effects, but these plants are issues across the world and pose a constant problem to natural ecosystems.
Weeds
are good and bad, invasive and native, small and expansive. Nothing is what it seems, and everything
deserves a second look.
No comments:
Post a Comment